[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#344614: marked as done (ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val')



Your message dated Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:02:07 -0800
with message-id <E1EqesR-0000HA-61@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#344614: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Dec 2005 03:25:55 +0000
>From blarson@blars.org Fri Dec 23 19:25:55 2005
Return-path: <blarson@blars.org>
Received: from blars.org ([64.81.35.59] helo=renig.nat.blars.org)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
	id 1Eq02c-00027T-Tp
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:55 -0800
Received: from quaff (quaff.nat.blars.org [172.16.2.7])
	by renig.nat.blars.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBO3Pq57006406
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:25:52 -0800
Received: from quaff.nat.blars.org (quaff [127.0.0.1])
	by quaff (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jBO3UbTF011716;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:38 -0800
Received: (from blarson@localhost)
	by quaff.nat.blars.org (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jBO3Ubul011714;
	Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:30:37 -0800
From: Blars Blarson <blarson@blars.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ocamlodbc: ftbfs [sparc] undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20051224033037.GA11691@blars.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.18
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: ocamlodbc
Severity: serious
Justification: no longer builds from source

ocamlodbc failed to build on a sparc buildd, duplicated on my sparc
pbuilder.  This seems to be the same error as 344463, so is probably
in a dependant package.

Some other architectures are still failing to build due to what looks like
bug 340103, which should probably be reopened.


+ grep -v DEBUG 'biniki.ml' > /tmp/camlpp3893ba
make[2]: gtk-config: Command not found
/usr/bin/ocamlc -verbose -custom -o biniki -ccopt -fPIC -ccopt -L../unixodbc -I ../unixodbc -ccopt "  -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2 " ocamlodbc.cma unix.cma str.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/lablgtk.cma /usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/gtkInit.cmo  biniki_messages.cmo biniki_misc.cmo biniki_context.cmo biniki_query_box.cmo biniki_window.cmo biniki.cmo
+ gcc -Wl,-E -o 'biniki' -I'/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' -fPIC -L../unixodbc   -L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2 -llablgtk2   -lodbc  -lodbc /tmp/camlprimd42d28.c  '-L../unixodbc' '-L/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0' '-llablgtk2' '-lgtk-x11-2.0' '-lgdk-x11-2.0' '-latk-1.0' '-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0' '-lm' '-lpangoxft-1.0' '-lpangox-1.0' '-lpangoft2-1.0' '-lpango-1.0' '-lgobject-2.0' '-lgmodule-2.0' '-ldl' '-lglib-2.0' '-lstr' '-lunix' '-locamlodbc' -lcamlrun -lm  -ldl -lcurses -lpthread
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtktree.o): In function `ml_gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtklist.o): In function `ml_gtk_clist_moveto': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtkedit.o): In function `ml_gtk_spin_button_spin': undefined reference to `caml_Double_val'
/usr/lib/ocaml/3.09.0/lablgtk2/liblablgtk2.a(ml_gtk.o): more undefined references to `caml_Double_val' follow
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Error while building custom runtime system
make[2]: *** [biniki] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make[1]: *** [unixodbc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/ocamlodbc-2.10/Biniki'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 344614-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Dec 2005 23:10:48 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun Dec 25 15:10:48 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EqesR-0000HA-61; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:02:07 -0800
From: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
To: 344614-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#344614: fixed in ocamlodbc 2.10-3
Message-Id: <E1EqesR-0000HA-61@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:02:07 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: ocamlodbc
Source-Version: 2.10-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ocamlodbc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.10-3_i386.deb
libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.10-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.10-3_i386.deb
ocamlodbc_2.10-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.10-3.diff.gz
ocamlodbc_2.10-3.dsc
  to pool/main/o/ocamlodbc/ocamlodbc_2.10-3.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 344614@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org> (supplier of updated ocamlodbc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 16:03:06 +0100
Source: ocamlodbc
Binary: libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian OCaml Maintainers <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Samuel Mimram <smimram@debian.org>
Description: 
 libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin - UnixODBC database bindings for OCaml, Biniki
 libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev - UnixODBC database bindings for OCaml, Development Files
Closes: 340103 344614
Changes: 
 ocamlodbc (2.10-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Updated makefiles.dpatch to build libocamlodbc.a and using back ocamlfind
     to do the installation, closes: #340103.
   * Rebuilding with binNMUed lablgtk2 on sparc, closes: #344614.
Files: 
 bf7bd5ab9a014162ee8df08c66c11e5e 796 devel optional ocamlodbc_2.10-3.dsc
 ec7b5eb1c22ec3ed29d8e39b4a6a3cb6 5334 devel optional ocamlodbc_2.10-3.diff.gz
 ca9efd63197da24f6a04bd98f38893b5 25576 libdevel optional libocamlodbc-ocaml-dev_2.10-3_i386.deb
 0339d3706094164f59c21a397e825b82 493876 misc optional libocamlodbc-ocaml-bin_2.10-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDryOAIae1O4AJae8RAmzZAKCExv5Kc8iI3c470ZwpAjkRgwuknQCeOA71
3ZhiyrPIRDAIdZJaetjpbAA=
=WUmc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: