On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:02:03AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote: > 1/ it is called caml-mode in sources since it applies to caml light > as well. Shall I keep calling it caml-mode or ocaml-mode? I vote for ocaml-mode (even if I believe that's a bit a namespace abuse having *-mode names for emacs mode packages, *-emacs-mode would have been better, but it seems to be a widely used convention). > 2/ this new package depends on ocaml-nox, and ocaml-nox needs to > depend on it until etch is released (for transitional purpose), > which makes a circular dependency. Is this a problem? Why it depends on ocaml-nox? As Sven I'm against the transitional purpose argument. I would go for no relationship at all (no Depends/Recommends/Suggests) from ocaml-nox to ocaml-mode and an entry in NEWS.Debian stating that the emacs mode has been moved to a separate package named ocaml-mode. Many thanks for your work Jerome, really. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ If there's any real truth it's that the entire multidimensional infinity of the Universe is almost certainly being run by a bunch of maniacs. -!-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature