[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [shoh@compiler.kaist.ac.kr: (Announce) "Gtk+ 2.0 Tree View Tutorial using Ocaml"]





Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:37:34PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:

On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:52:46AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:

This should maybe be included in the lablgtk-doc package ? Anyone has
time for this (me, i will probably be overbooked for the next 3 weeks,
so altough i should have time to be here for urgencies and ocaml/sarge
release management issues, i really won't have time to do any real
work).

It seems a good idea to me.

More generally, IIRC there is another good tutorial on ocaml (I don't
remember the name but it could be easily googled, sorry I'm offline now)
which includes two chapter about GTK programming in ocaml.

The Gtk docs are the same already packaged in lablgtk-doc (or whatever the
name of said package is, if it escaped NEW or something).

Indeed, liblablgtk2-ocaml-doc.

In fact I've had a whishlist bug (#271317) to have this tutorial packaged. I've talked with upstream which, I guess, motivated the release of this tutorial.
I'm going to add it to the package soon.

We should consider packaging the tutorial and suggesting it both from
the ocaml-doc package and from the lablgtk-doc package.

Notice that i think the ocaml tutorial paackage which was rescently announced
on the caml list has licencing problems which appear somewhat unsolveable (it
takes documentation from both the caml manual stuff under 'ask author first'
licence and yacc/lex documentations.

I don't think this package borrows things from the ocaml man. And the license seems to be fine to me:

This tutorial may be redistributed and modified freely in any form, as long as all authors are given due credit for their work and all non-trivial changes by third parties are clearly marked as such either within the document (e.g. in a revision history), or at an external and publicly accessible place that is refered to in the document (e.g. a CVS repository).

Cheers,

Samuel.



Reply to: