Re: camlp4 syntax extensions' naming convention

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:55:02PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 02:29:35PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I think we should better have a naming convention for camlp4 syntax
> > estension instead of picking randon names. What about restating our
> > current libraries naming convention into something like lib<foo>-camlp4?
> 
> No other comments? Should I assume that this proposal is ok and write
> the corresponding policy paragraph?

Sounds fine to me.

BTW, is the policy accesible by the new project homepage ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther