Re: mod_caml and cocanwiki (was: Re: Cocanwiki package)
On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 11:23:41AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> On Friday 10 September 2004 11:21 am, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > Argh, this is all so complex and wrong. Why not use Arch and
> > > tla-buildpackage?
> > Because tla is horrendous and uncomprehensible :)
> The docs are better now :-)
> > Well, what guarantee do you have that the tarball will always be
> > available ? If nothing else it should always go with the tagged
> Why do you need that guarantee?
Because, at least for GPLed stuff, we somehow promised 3 year of source
> > versions, but then, arch doesn't support proper tagging anyway.
> Actually, it's called configs, but the need for tags/svn cp/whatever is
> mostly removed by its design.
Not convinced, and i had the arch guys explaining to me for almost half a day
when i was going to do the parted arch repo.