Re: APT has been fixed
Quoting Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>:
> > But since APT can now decide to install a package if it is the only one
> > provided by a virtual package, I guess they don't need to consider this
> > case and can let APT do the job, right?
>
> Maybe, but not sure. I think the autobuilders have some extra way of
> handling virtual build dependencies, but i don't know for sure.
I guess so.
> > We definitely need versioned provides, I think.
>
> I guess embedding the api/abi in the virtual package name should be
> enough.
For us, yes.
--
Jérôme Marant
Reply to: