Re: opkg-buildpackage vs. svn-buildpackage
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:48:14AM -0800, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> Now that I've tried opkg-buildpackage, I like it and I don't think we need to
> mess with the layout.
> I have updated numerix and cryptokit in the svn repository to merge the
> existing debian/changelog entries into one, so that an upload sponsor can
> build -1 packages that include the orig.tar.gz in the upload. I followed
> Sylvain's suggestion to close the cryptokit ITP bug via the changelog entry,
> and added tetex-extra to Numerix's build-depends to get amssymb.sty. I think
> they're ready for review and upload, modulo Sylvain and Xavier's review of
> the RSA implementation against Numerix.