Re: Accepted mlgtk 2.0.0-9 (source)
Quoting Sven Luther <email@example.com>:
> > Why maintaining this package since everyone use lablgtk?
> Because it was an easy fix, because it got listed in the debian/gnome RC
> bugs, because i have not had time to make an annoucement on the caml
> list about its removal, and because, as last remaining upstream, i am
> somewhat sentimental about it. Because last i asked one or two people
> were still using it.
Are you sure you didn't miss any reason? :-)
> Anyway, its an easy package to maintain, i guess nobody uses it and thus
> doesn't report bugs :))), so there is no problem in keeping it around.
> It is small enough to not bloat the archive. I will reconsider the
> problem when 3.07 ships though.
Your business :)