[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#182270: libcamlimages-ocaml-dev: png2 png12 problem



On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:37:49AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 07:34:17AM +0100, Sylvain LE GALL wrote:
> > Is it possible to depends on libpng2-dev for camlimages ?
> 
> I'm discussing the problem both with the upstream maintainer and with
> lablgtk maintainer, but we haven't yet managed to reach an agreement on
> what to do.
> 
> Moreover I'm really busy actually and last lablgtk upload was an NMU by
> Sven Luther, if you have suggestion or similar on this issue please
> report it also to the debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org mailing list
> so that you can reach a wider audience.
> 
> Thanks for the report.
> Cheers.
> 
> -- 
> Stefano Zacchiroli  -  Undergraduate Student of CS @ Uni. Bologna, Italy
> zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it}  -  http://www.bononia.it/zack/
> "  I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not
> sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!  " -- G.Romney

Hello,

I am CCing the message to debian-ocaml. 

The libcamlimages-ocaml-dev depends on libpng12-0-dev and should depends
on libpng2-dev. I explain myself :
Lib                        | Depends
libcamlimages-ocaml-dev    | libpng12-0-dev
libgtkxmhtml-dev           | libpng2-dev
liblablgtk-dev             | libgtkxmhtml-dev

libpng12-0-dev conflicts with libpng2-dev

So i cannot install lablgtk if i want to install libcamlimages.

Furthermore, libcamlimages builds his gtk extension against lablgtk2.

So i have problem to build a lablgtk application with images support.

That was the point.

I have a proposal of solution : 
* splitting the libcamlimages packages.

Let says :
libcamlimages-$ext$
libcamlimages-$ext$-dev

with $ext$ in jpeg, png12-0, lablgtk, lablgtk2, gif, core

The core package contains the image description. (ci_image.cm[x]a)

Plus a libcamlimages which depends on libcamlimages-* ( and the same
with libcamlimages-*-dev ). 


I am not sure it is the ideal solution.

Just say me what you think about it 

Regard
Sylvain LE GALL



Reply to: