On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:21:46PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote: > > BTW, stefano proposed to upload ocaml-3.06 and ocaml-3.07, and have > > ocaml being a dummy package depending on the version we like. > > This works like this for Python (and GCC) because people have to provide > multiple versions of libraries, one for each version. > We clearly don't want to do that but rather ease transitions, and > remove the old version of ocaml when possible. > We must tell the use we do not support old versions of ocaml. I've retought about this a bit and I realized that to follow the python way, as you stated, we have to add a new binary package to the archive for every library and remove the old binary package afterward. This is really overkilling, I'd rather prefer the ocaml + ocaml cvs snapshot solution now. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney
Attachment:
pgpWLZAhSTOM0.pgp
Description: PGP signature