Re: ocamlopt issue

[Sven Luther <luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:14:49PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:09:29PM +0200, J?r?me Marant wrote:
> >   Ocamlsdl needs ocamlopt and it seems that ocamlopt is not
> >   provided by all architectures (not suprisingly).
> 
> So we can't have a bytecode versione of ocamlsdl, right?
> 
> >   So what is the best way to handle this? Should I specify
> >   all the architecture providing ocamlopt in the Architecture:
> >   field?
> 
> Yes, this is the right choice.
> IIRC Ralf's solution will inhibit ocamlsdl from entering testing due to
> missing package build dependencies.

to simplify things, i will install a file with the ocaml package which
will list all ocamlopt supported architecture, so you can easily
generate such build dependencies automatically with a variable
substitution.

I will do this in my next ocaml package.

(BTW, dll.so will go into /usr/lib/ocaml/stublibs, Xavier is ok with
this choice, and it will be standard in 3.05).

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ocaml-maint-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org