[henning@makholm.net: Re: Ocaml status?]

[Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

----- Forwarded message from Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net> -----

Envelope-to: luther@lambda.u-strasbg.fr
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Apr 2000 22:03:41 +0200
Delivered-To: luther@debian.org
To: David Starner <dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org>
Cc: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>,
        Lynn Winebarger <owinebar@free-expression.org>,
        debian-legal <debian-legal@lists.debian.org>, clebars@debian.org,
        luther@debian.org
Subject: Re: Ocaml status?
X-My-Web-page: http://www.diku.dk/students/makholm/
From: Henning Makholm <henning@makholm.net>
Date: 06 Apr 2000 21:58:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: David Starner's message of Thu, 6 Apr 2000 14:44:49 -0500
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.2

Scripsit David Starner <dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 08:53:45PM +0200, Henning Makholm wrote:

> > The bytecode interpreter and the run-time libraries needed to
> > be linked with it are all GPL.

> Not according to the copyright file. The copyright file included
> in Debian says LGPL.

You're right. I'll go bang my head into a wall. Please disregard
the rest of what I wrote.

-- 
Henning Makholm                                   "Hør, hvad er det egentlig
                                          der ikke kan blive ved med at gå?"

----- End forwarded message -----