[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Endorsing Felix Zielcke's key 2D685DD4E0BBBD5202B91777B76DB9FFF0B6BF1F



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

For nm.debian.org, at 2022-02-13:
For the past 1.5 months, I have worked with Felix Zielcke on pcmemtest.

For this past work, Felix Zielcke sent mails using the email address fzielcke@z-51.de
which is the one they're using on nm.debian.org, and they signed their work and
email using a GPG key with fingerprint 2D68 5DD4 E0BB BD52 02B9  1777 B76D B9FF F0B6 BF1F.

I've made sure that they are able to decrypt encrypted messages sent to this key
and that they're able to sign messages with the same key.

Due to the interactions we had, I'm convinced that Felix Zielcke as they
present themselves on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of both email
fzielcke@z-51.de and GPG key 2D68 5DD4 E0BB BD52 02B9  1777 B76D B9FF F0B6 BF1F.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2oz4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Stephan Lachnit (via nm.debian.org)

For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/fzielcke/2D685DD4E0BBBD5202B91777B76DB9FFF0B6BF1F/endorsements/view/
-- 
https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/fzielcke/2D685DD4E0BBBD5202B91777B76DB9FFF0B6BF1F/endorsements/view/


Reply to: