Endorsing Antonio Valentino's key 3B70F209A5FFD68903C472C5EBF48AB2578F9812
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
For nm.debian.org, at 2021-02-13:
For the past 3 years, I have worked with Antonio Valentino on numexpr and pytables
in the debian-science team.
For this past work, Antonio Valentino sent mails using the email address antonio.valentino@tiscali.it
which is the one they're using on nm.debian.org, and they signed their work and
email using a GPG key with fingerprint 3B70 F209 A5FF D689 03C4 72C5 EBF4 8AB2 578F 9812.
I've made sure that they are able to decrypt encrypted messages sent to this key
and that they're able to sign messages with the same key.
Due to the long-term interactions we had, I'm convinced that Antonio Valentino as they present themselves on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of both email
antonio.valentino@tiscali.it and GPG key 3B70 F209 A5FF D689 03C4 72C5 EBF4 8AB2 578F 9812.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=fbOU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Frédéric-Emmanuel Picca (via nm.debian.org)
For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/avalentino/3B70F209A5FFD68903C472C5EBF48AB2578F9812/endorsements/view/
--
https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/avalentino/3B70F209A5FFD68903C472C5EBF48AB2578F9812/endorsements/view/
Reply to: