[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Endorsing Mark Hindley's key 506C15A42B0AF5A0A85423EED28A45BF3287D649



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

For nm.debian.org, at 2021-01-29:

I have been in touch with Mark since roughly 2007, he took over my apt-cacher package.

The earliest use of the key
506C 15A4 2B0A F5A0 A854  23EE D28A 45BF 3287 D649
known to me was in a conversation in 2017, I can verify the signature of that message in my mail archive without any issue, it appears to be the same key.

I can confirm that we can communicate in encrypted way using his private key which was bundled with the key aforementioned key received back then.

Due to the long-term interactions we had, I'm convinced that Mark Hindley as he
present himself on nm.debian.org is the rightful owner of both email
mark@hindley.org.uk and GPG key 506C 15A4 2B0A F5A0 A854  23EE D28A 45BF 3287 D649.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=2RUM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Eduard Bloch (via nm.debian.org)

For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/leepen/506C15A42B0AF5A0A85423EED28A45BF3287D649/endorsements/view/
-- 
https://nm.debian.org/fprs/person/leepen/506C15A42B0AF5A0A85423EED28A45BF3287D649/endorsements/view/


Reply to: