Ian Jackson dijo [Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:19:19PM +0000]: > (...) > As I understand it the correct way to implement this would be for DMs > to have accounts in LDAP. (Presumably flagged in some appropriate way > so that they don't get more permissions than necessary.) > > Is this something that DSA and DM-keyring are happy with ? If so, how > can we make it happen ? The workflow for keyring would be quite similar to what we currently have, and maybe it would even simplify some details such as retaining permissions after a key migration. So I would not object to it. But then again, AFAICT implementing this is completely outside of our hands (we would only need minor adjustements to our scripts).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature