[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: DM application of Philip Rinn

On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 04:21:59PM +0100, "Steffen Möller" wrote:
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 08. Januar 2014 um 22:23 Uhr
>> Von: "Piotr Ozarowski" <ozarow@gmail.com>
>> I sponsor subtitleeditor package (Philip took it over in 2010) and
>> I will not have any doubts to give him upload permissions for it.
> I just sponsored r-cran-scatterplot3d for Phil and the only bit that
> annoyed me was that he was not a DM already, so I reminded him :o)

Hello Steffen and Piotr,

Two-lines advocacies!

Please consider sending a more extensive/detailed advocacy message.

And Steffen's advocacy isn't signed.

it reads:

 A Debian Developer should only advocate a Debian Maintainer candidate
 if they are familiar with the candidate's existing work in Debian and
 believe it to be of a suitable standard both technically and socially.

 Debian Developers advocating Debian Maintainer candidates (or potential
 Debian Developers for that matter) must go into a bit more detail in
 their advocacy.

 If the Debian Maintainer candidate has done "a great job", please
 explain what "a great job" means -- is there something special the
 candidate has done, or is it that whatever the candidate is working on
 is particularly important, or is the candidate remarkably consistent, or

 What has the candidate actually done that has earned your trust? What
 makes the candidate special compared to the other folks who are helping
 Debian? What in particular about the candidate's work should people
 lurking on the Debian lists be trying to emulate if they want to be a
 Debian Maintainer or a Debian Developer?

 For example, if the Debian Maintainer candidate has good packaging
 skills, go into a bit more detail about what's convinced you the
 candidate has got those skills? Are there any difficult bugs you've
 worked together on, or new features the candidate has done a good job of
 getting into Debian, or has the candidate been particularly helpful
 supporting users, or...? 



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: