Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 05:10:11PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> It's infinitely less efficient for people who are not okay with
> running untrusted, often non-free (or even undistributable) code on
> their machines.
Fantastic. Then you can follow the "all people" link on the same page.
Or, even better, please send a patch for an alternate version of the
page, or any other page you feel like being patronising about. The git
of the code is linked at the bottom of each page in the site.
Ciao,
Enrico who believes he's doing enough work on it as it is.
--
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to:
- References:
- bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Mehdi Dogguy <mehdi@dogguy.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
- Re: bits from the NM process: advocacy, no more AM reports, AMs needed
- From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>