[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DM application of Hsin-Yi Chen



package debian-maintainers
tags 631088 + moreinfo
stop

On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 01:48:26AM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:10:21PM +0800, HsinYI Chen (hychen) wrote:
>>This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer
>><URL:http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer>.
>>I have read the Social Contract, Debian Free Software Guidelines and
>>Debian Machine Usage Policy and agree with all of them.
>>
>>Currently, I maintain the package python-ucltip(I am the upstream
>>author[1]) and sponsored by
>>Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) <paulliu@debian.org>.
>>
>>My GnuPG key 28F60193 is signed by the Debian Developer Kan-Ru Chen
>>(s??) <koster@debian.org>
>>I look forward to becoming a Debian Maintainer. Thanks for your attention.
>>
>>[1]: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ucltip/
>>
>>Best regards,
>>Hsin Yi Chen
>>
>>More about me: http://about.me/hychen
>
>Dear all,
>
>I think hychen has good ability to do Debian packages. Especially python
>packages. While working together with him on python-ucltip package, I
>found he is not only a good python developer, but also a good packager
>to make proper python Debian packages. He creates some scripts to help
>him maintain and create his packages [1]. Also while sponsoring, his
>package always looks good. Not only passes the lintian test but also
>having clean builds on pbuilder and runs properly.
>
>Besides, he triages several bugs on ibus and other packages.
>
>Thus I support his application to become a Debian maintainer because he
>can handle his packages well.
>
>Regards,
>Paul
>
>[1] https://github.com/hychen/dh-make-python
>
>-- 
>                                PaulLiu (?????????)
>E-mail: Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) <paulliu@debian.org>

You signed your advocacy message with RSA key 3D058888 which isn't in
the Debian keyring yet. Please sign it with your key 34A26946.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: