On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:07:31PM +1100, Anibal Monsalve Salazar wrote: >On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:32:39PM +0100, Piotr O??arowski wrote: >>[Stephen Kitt] >>>This is my declaration of intent to become a Debian Maintainer >> >>I support Stephen's application (I'm sponsoring mednafen and stella) > >Please give us more details in your advocacy. > >At http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer, it reads: > > Advocating a Debian Maintainer > > A Debian Developer should only advocate a Debian Maintainer candidate > if they are familiar with the candidate's existing work in Debian and > believe it to be of a suitable standard both technically and socially. > > Debian Developers advocating Debian Maintainer candidates (or > potential Debian Developers for that matter) must go into a bit more > detail in their advocacy. > > If the Debian Maintainer candidate has done "a great job", please > explain what "a great job" means -- is there something special the > candidate has done, or is it that whatever the candidate is working on > is particularly important, or is the candidate remarkably consistent, > or what? > > What has the candidate actually done that has earned your trust? What > makes the candidate special compared to the other folks who are > helping Debian? What in particular about the candidate's work should > people lurking on the Debian lists be trying to emulate if they want > to be a Debian Maintainer or a Debian Developer? > > For example, if the Debian Maintainer candidate has good packaging > skills, go into a bit more detail about what's convinced you the > candidate has got those skills? Are there any difficult bugs you've > worked together on, or new features the candidate has done a good job > of getting into Debian, or has the candidate been particularly helpful > supporting users, or...? ping
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature