On 08/26/2010 09:23 AM, Kumar Appaiah wrote: > I think it's signed; just not with a key available to me from a > keyserver (at least at the moment, from the Debian keyring or a > keyserver). right you are, looking at the source of the message, it claims to be signed with 0xE1836E6B3572E461, but the signature is made over the ripemd160 digest. My MUA (icedove + enigmail) doesn't even indicate that the message has a signature, whether i have that key in my local keyring or not. I'll file a bug against enigmail, sorry for the noise (note that i'm unable to verify Cristoph's signature as a result of this bug) --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature