[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Advocating Martin Bagge <brother@bsnet.se>

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 07:36:17AM +0000, NM Front Desk wrote:
> Auth-Key: nmauthbd851410704607bac60c42b327b34039
> Applicant: Martin Bagge <brother@bsnet.se>
> Why do you advocate this person? (please provide a 5-10 line summary).

Since the GR to accept non-packaging members in the project passed, I think
Martin Bagge is a typical example of someone who now can become an
official voting member of the Debian project.

Martin has been handling swedish translations for some time and coordinated
with other interested people to get swedish translations of Debian to
possibly reach 100% for squeeze.

I personally believe a continued thankless effort of both working on
translations and "coaching" swedish translations to become a real team
effort is something that deserves alot of credit.

> You are encouraged to take questions such as the following into account
> but you're not limited to answering these:
>  - How have they contributed to Debian already?

Translations, etc.

>  - What do they intend to do for Debian in the future?

Continued work on translations.

>  - How do they interact with others, such as users and other developers?

For all I've seen Martin is very good at communicating with other people.

> Please note that your answer may be cited on a public mailing list unless
> you indicate otherwise.
> This is an automated message from the Debian New Maintainer website.
> Someone (possibly you) from the IP address
> nominated the Debian developer with the login "ah" as an advocate
> for Martin Bagge's application.
> If you want to complete the advocacy process reply to this email, answer
> the questions above and GPG sign it. Please also make sure to include the
> Auth-Key (listed above) in your GPG signed reply.
> If you do not want to advocate this application or do not know what it
> means, just ignore this email.

Andreas Henriksson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: