[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is Kiwamu Okabe now an official Debian developer ?



This one time, at band camp, Manfred Lichtenstern said:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> for Kiwamu Okabe i found:
> 
> Intent to become a Debian Maintainer
> 
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2010/01/msg00038.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2010/01/msg00039.html
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2010/01/msg00040.html
> 
> I found nothing at https://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php
> for Kiwamu Okabe.
> 
> But i found at https://db.debian.org/
> 
> Kiwamu Okabe (uid=kiwamu,ou=users,dc=debian,dc=org)
> Login:               kiwamu
> Gender:              unspecified
> Preferred shell:     /bin/bash
> PGP/GPG fingerprint: DF60 3D3A 3C15 1B2C DF19 52F4 18DD 4D72 F2CB CA06
> 
> 
> $ finger kiwamu@db.debian.org
> [db.debian.org]
> uid=kiwamu,ou=users,dc=debian,dc=org
> First name: Kiwamu
> Last name: Okabe
> Email: Kiwamu Okabe <kiwamu@debian.org>
> Fingerprint: DF60 3D3A 3C15 1B2C DF19 52F4 18DD 4D72 F2CB CA06
> Key block: finger kiwamu/key@db.debian.org
> 
> 
> Is Kiwamu Okabe now an official Debain developer ?
> 
> Or is my check wrong ?

It is:

sgran@master:~$ ldapsearch -x '(uid=kiwamu)' gidNumber
# kiwamu, users, debian.org
dn: uid=kiwamu,ou=users,dc=debian,dc=org
gidNumber: 60000
sgran@master:~$ ldapsearch -x '(&(gidNumber=60000)(objectClass=debianGroup))'
# guest, users, debian.org
dn: gid=guest,ou=users,dc=debian,dc=org
gidNumber: 60000
objectClass: top
objectClass: debianGroup
gid: guest

This means kiwamu is a DM who has requested access to project resources
and has gotten a temporary account to use those resources.

Cheers,
-- 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
|   ,''`.                                            Stephen Gran |
|  : :' :                                        sgran@debian.org |
|  `. `'                        Debian user, admin, and developer |
|    `-                                     http://www.debian.org |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: