[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

More patches for the templates



Hello,

A few minor issues:

  0013-There-is-only-one-workaround-that-I-know-of.patch
  0014-foo-is-confusing-libfoo-is-not.patch
  0015-Removed-broken-link.patch
  0016-Fixed-messy-language.patch
  0017-I-cannot-see-a-use-for-the-single-quotes.patch

And a revert for a previous patch, once we figured that +nmuN is only
used in native packages:

  0018-No-nmuX-for-non-native-packages.patch


Ciao,

Enrico

-- 
GPG key: 4096R/E7AD5568 2009-05-08 Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
From 047c2f783b2946632b35e4320b54fafe272de336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:21:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 13/18] There is only one workaround that I know of

---
 nm_ts1.txt |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_ts1.txt b/nm_ts1.txt
index 719b5eb..a88f008 100644
--- a/nm_ts1.txt
+++ b/nm_ts1.txt
@@ -188,4 +188,4 @@ PPB1. What does automake's AM_MAINTAINER_MODE do? Why is it useful for
       package?
 
 PFB2. Dpkg does not support versioned provides.
-      Explain what that means, and list common workarounds.
+      Explain what that means, and show a common workaround.
-- 
1.6.3.3

From 54a270d4b4731b93914b5bcc96a1fbdbdd0b45db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:29:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 14/18] foo is confusing, libfoo is not

---
 nm_ts2.txt |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_ts2.txt b/nm_ts2.txt
index 8459b28..4308a51 100644
--- a/nm_ts2.txt
+++ b/nm_ts2.txt
@@ -57,9 +57,9 @@ AL5. What build target would you use in debian/rules to build a package
 AL6. What is endianness and why does it matter when supporting multiple
      architectures?
 
-AL7. Why does a foo-dev package depend on foo?
-     Why is it fooX-dev and not foo-dev in some cases?
-     (When) is fooX-dev preferable over foo-dev?
+AL7. Why does a libfoo-dev package depend on libfooX?
+     Why is it libfooX-dev and not libfoo-dev in some cases?
+     (When) is libfooX-dev preferable over libfoo-dev?
 
 AL8. What are library sonames, and what are they used for? What is the
      "ELF" format?
-- 
1.6.3.3

From 4206ad242bed8ddccb64d455002fa4b607dd8fa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:11:17 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 15/18] Removed broken link

---
 nm_pp1.txt |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_pp1.txt b/nm_pp1.txt
index 5a36784..3f488e9 100644
--- a/nm_pp1.txt
+++ b/nm_pp1.txt
@@ -163,9 +163,6 @@ Finally, some important web links:
   http://packages.qa.debian.org/
              The Package Tracking System.
 
-  http://people.debian.org/~walters/descriptions.html
-             A small Guide "Writing Debian package descriptions".
-
   https://buildd.debian.org/~luk/status/
              Watch your package status.
 
-- 
1.6.3.3

From e859b6f9c9873c07121938fee7a64c63454a0516 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:34:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 16/18] Fixed messy language

---
 nm_pp2.txt |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_pp2.txt b/nm_pp2.txt
index b470b88..04b5937 100644
--- a/nm_pp2.txt
+++ b/nm_pp2.txt
@@ -24,8 +24,8 @@ BT2. You have a package (current version 1.3), with a set of open bugs:
        #789: segfaults every Sunday (fixed in 1.4)
        #901: please move config file to /usr/local/etc
 
-     Please write a changelog entry for the upload your shiny new
-     version 1.4 package.  What do you do with the bugs not mentioned
+     Please write a changelog entry for the upload of the new version
+     1.4 of the package.  What do you do with the bugs not mentioned
      in the changelog?
 
 BT3. Each bug report has a severity and optionally one or more tags. What's
-- 
1.6.3.3

From 7a4815d6938ef174f3796884f48152e0b0f9c654 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:49:44 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 17/18] I cannot see a use for the single quotes

---
 nm_pp2.txt |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_pp2.txt b/nm_pp2.txt
index 04b5937..b871f28 100644
--- a/nm_pp2.txt
+++ b/nm_pp2.txt
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@ BT6. What do you do if you want to reach the submitter of a bug and keep a
 BT7. Where can you find the list of defined BTS pseudo packages?
      Explain to me what a pseudo package is.
 
-BT8. Please explain what a 'usertag' is and why they're useful.
-     How do you tag a bug with a 'usertag'?
+BT8. Please explain what a usertag is and why they're useful.
+     How do you tag a bug with a usertag?
 
 
 Procedures
-- 
1.6.3.3

From b558b05baf84968e46773fafeacc0eaa852d17b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:47:12 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 18/18] No +nmuX for non-native packages

---
 nm_ts1.txt |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/nm_ts1.txt b/nm_ts1.txt
index a88f008..8438f8d 100644
--- a/nm_ts1.txt
+++ b/nm_ts1.txt
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ RC2. Please look at http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html,
 Debian Package Format
 ---------------------
 
-PF1. What does version 2:3.4~rc1-2+nmu1+lenny1 mean? What Debian control file
+PF1. What does version 2:3.4~rc1-2.1+lenny1 mean? What Debian control file
      would you put this in?
 
 PF2. What does the version string in the Standards-Version field of a
-- 
1.6.3.3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: