Re: Proposed patches for NM templates
Enrico Zini wrote:
> After 2 NM candidates pointed out to me that the NMU is versioned as
> +nmu1 instead of .1, I noticed that the developers-reference was
> indeed changed in that way in version 3.4.1. Therefore question PF1
> needs to be updated.
I though there was no clear concensus on using +nmuX on non-native packages,
do you have any pointer?
Not that I'm against it, but I would like to make sure devref is changed
based on encouraged recommendations and not just to change how things are
done (and I don't imply that it is happening.)
Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net