On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 10:19 +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: > A sponsor has to do that. No DM is allowed to introduce new binary > packages, even if that's just because of a name change. This is what is > meant by "package is not NEW". It depends on the definition of "package" etc. If I added a new binary package, for example, to split off part of a package, then only that new package is NEW, however, the package as a whole gets held in the NEW queue. I think, at a minimum, I'd like to see the wording changed to something that states that it counts for any package that needs to go through NEW rather than for wholly new packages
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part