On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 09:00 +0100, Sven Mueller wrote: > Thijs' calculation that the FD check would need to eliminate over 50% of > all applications (or rather: ask for more (or more precise) answers) to > actually save some work is a bit off course. It does save the DAM some > work as soon as it eliminates a single application, but it won't ever > save any work of the total workload. My calculation is based on the assumption that the time of DAM and of FD is equally valuable. If a DAM is a lot more expensive than a FD you'd save by rejecting some applications in the FD-step. But since both are valued Debian volunteers I don't see why the their effort should be valued differently. > IMHO, two checks would be enough, so either AM + FD oder AM + DAM. FD > might take some parts of the checks from DAM if DAM is asked to keep > doing a full check, but it will be too much good if both do a full > check. Exactly. > _IF_ it is not the case that FD and DAM both do a full check, it would > be nice (if for nothing else) for transparancy reasons if they > published > who checks which parts,. Indeed. Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part