[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: The future of the Debian NM process



On Tuesday 16 May 2006 05:04, Christoph Berg wrote:
> The process I propose looks like:

> 2. contributes to Debian:
>    -> work on the package (bug fixing, new upstream releases) with
>       sponsored uploads
>    -> 2nd package with >> 1 upload (e.g. not a totally trivial package,
>       a rule of thumb could be like at least 6 uploads for all packages
>       in total)
>    -> some other contributions (e.g. bugs on other packages)

what's the rationale for needing a 2nd package? 

e.g. I currently maintain 1 small simple sponsered package, I also have 
contributed for several years as a translator. 

If we're introducing a new stage with upload rights for specific packages 
why shouldn't I be able to get upload rights for my 1 package?
-- 
Cheers, cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)
  
1. Encrypted mail preferred (GPG KeyID: 0x86624ABB)
2. Plain-text mail recommended since I move html and double
    format mails to a low priority folder (they're mainly spam)

Attachment: pgpScXcvGj3oI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: