* Scott James Remnant (scott@netsplit.com) wrote: > To be honest, the ONLY thing I would like to see on this mailing list is > James' DAM rejection mails, and the subsequent vote for whether to > tickle him or not. > > Once that vote has been carried to a rejection, there should be a post > to newmaint with the actual rejection. Agreed (with all of it, but no need to quote it all). Additionally, I don't remember anything in the 'reject' policy about how to get a vote started... Maybe I missed it, but if not then perhaps we should modify it slightly to say something like someone on the NM committee must propose a vote and be at least seconded? Stepen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature