[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [patch]: NM page update request (GPG)



Yo again!

On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 18:52, Osamu Aoki wrote:

> After thinking about it, even better way is to ask user to check
> available host himself.  But it does not work well now :-(
> 
> nospam@goofy:nospam$ host pgp.net|grep wwwkeys
> pgp.net has no A record (Authoritative answer)
> nospam@goofy:nospam$ host -l pgp.net|grep wwwkeys
> wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net.     PTR     horowitz.surfnet.nl.
> wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net.     A       194.171.167.2
> wwwkeys.pl.pgp.net.     A       193.219.28.2
> wwwkeys.ch.pgp.net.     A       212.55.198.213
>  !!! keys.de.pgp.net MX host math.uni-paderborn.de is not canonical
>  !!! keys.uni-paderborn.de.pgp.net MX host math.uni-paderborn.de is not canonical
> wwwkeys.de.pgp.net.     A       193.174.13.72
> wwwkeys.dk.pgp.net.     A       130.226.106.11
> wwwkeys.cz.pgp.net.     A       193.165.192.80
>  *** incomplete TXT record for wwwkeys.es.pgp.net, offset 8161
> 
> Is this because recent root DNS server attack?  It has been like this from
> yeasterday for sure.

avbidder@zbasel:/usr/share/spamassassin$ host -l pgp.net       
Host pgp.net not found: 5(REFUSED)
; Transfer failed.

Intersting. No idea what's up here.

cheers
-- vbi

> -- 
> ~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
>         Osamu Aoki <osamu@debian.org>   Cupertino CA USA, GPG-key: A8061F32
>  .''`.  Debian Reference: post-installation user's guide for non-developers
>  : :' : http://qref.sf.net and http://people.debian.org/~osamu
>  `. `'  "Our Priorities are Our Users and Free Software" --- Social Contract
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-newmaint-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
-- 
this email is protected by a digital signature:  http://fortytwo.ch/gpg

NOTE: keyserver bugs! get my key here: https://fortytwo.ch/gpg/92082481

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: