Re: Reaping non-advocated applicants
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 07:47:21AM -0500, Gopal Narayanan wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 09:52:32PM +0100, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like a good idea to me. But what to do with them? I think that
> > applicants that have not found an advocate after, say, 4 weeks should
> > be removed.
>
> I think that is a bit harsh. My suggestion is to leave them in the
> queue, and not process them (i.e. hand them over to an AM) until they
> find an advocate. A weekly/monthly auto-remider might be sent to the
> applicant reminding them of this situation. Sometimes, it might take
> an applicant more than 4 weeks to get advocated, and by booting them
> out, we might potentially turn off a good applicant.
is it really that hard for a "good applicant" to get
advocated within a 4 week period?
besides, they can always re-apply
once they get advocated.
--
Brian Russo <brusso@phys.hawaii.edu>
Debian/GNU Linux <wolfie@debian.org> http://www.debian.org
LPSG "member" <wolfie@lpsg.org> http://www.lpsg.org
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Reply to: