gnupg 1.0.1 <-> gnupg 1.0.2 problem? (Re: AM Report on Chris Rutter)

[Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp>]

Hi,

At Tue, 19 Sep 2000 22:58:29 +0900,
Fumitoshi UKAI <ukai@debian.or.jp> wrote:

> > On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 10:42:52PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> > > Does anyone else see my pgp signature was bad?
> > 
> > Couldn't resist.
> > ME TOO!!
> > 
> > Looks like you have a problem.

I think I find the problem.

 * It can be verified by pgp-i and gnupg 1.0.1-2 in mutt 1.2.5-1
   No problem.  It says: Good signature

 * It can't be verified by gnupg 1.0.2-1 in mutt 1.2.5-1
   It says: Bad signature

gpg-rsa in potato and woody are the same version 2.1.1.
Note that the message has been signed by pgp-i (on potato machine)

It looks like gnupg 1.0.2 bug. Can anyone else check it?

Thanks,
Fumitoshi UKAI