Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe
- To: Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com>
- Cc: Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org>, nm-admin@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de, debian-newmaint-discuss@lists.debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [nm-admin] Identification step in the current scheme (Re: Fe
- From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2000 22:54:28 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000730225428.D709@cistron.nl>
- Mail-followup-to: Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com>, Taketoshi Sano <sano@debian.org>, nm-admin@cipsa.physik.uni-freiburg.de, debian-newmaint-discuss@lists.debian.org, debian-project@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] XFMail.20000730111833.jwest@netnw.com>; from jwest@netnw.com on Sun, Jul 30, 2000 at 11:18:33AM -0700
- References: <y5awvi34ng4.fsf_-_@sano@debian.org> <[🔎] XFMail.20000730111833.jwest@netnw.com>
Previously Jim Westveer wrote:
> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
> that I do infact, possess that private key.
Signing an arbitrary something proves that just as well. For example
a package, the output of fortune, etc.
Wichert.
--
_________________________________________________________________
/ Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
| wichert@wiggy.net http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
Attachment:
pgpzQ8NkyUH9b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: