Bug#1113203: libsoxr: diff for NMU version 0.1.3-4.1
Control: tags 1113203 + patch
Control: tags 1113203 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for libsoxr (versioned as 0.1.3-4.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/15. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diffstat for libsoxr-0.1.3 libsoxr-0.1.3
changelog | 7 +++++++
patches/cmake-4.patch | 15 +++++++++++++++
patches/series | 1 +
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
diff -Nru libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/changelog libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/changelog
--- libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/changelog 2020-05-06 17:13:53.000000000 +0300
+++ libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/changelog 2025-11-14 22:26:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+libsoxr (0.1.3-4.1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Fix FTBFS with CMake 4. (Closes: #1113203)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:26:45 +0200
+
libsoxr (0.1.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/cmake-4.patch libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/cmake-4.patch
--- libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/cmake-4.patch 1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/cmake-4.patch 2025-11-14 22:26:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+Description: Fix FTBFS with CMake 4
+Author: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/1113203
+
+--- libsoxr-0.1.3.orig/CMakeLists.txt
++++ libsoxr-0.1.3/CMakeLists.txt
+@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
+ # SoX Resampler Library Copyright (c) 2007-18 robs@users.sourceforge.net
+ # Licence for this file: LGPL v2.1 See LICENCE for details.
+
+-cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 3.1 FATAL_ERROR)
++cmake_minimum_required (VERSION 3.5 FATAL_ERROR)
+
+ set (DESCRIPTION_SUMMARY
+ "High quality, one-dimensional sample-rate conversion library")
diff -Nru libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/series libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/series
--- libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/series 2020-05-06 17:13:53.000000000 +0300
+++ libsoxr-0.1.3/debian/patches/series 2025-11-14 22:26:45.000000000 +0200
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
fix-cmake-set-project-version.patch
+cmake-4.patch
Reply to: