[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1090775: csound: uses removed --with buildinfo



Source: csound
Version: 1:6.18.1+dfsg-3
Severity: serious
Tags: patch ftbfs

Dear Maintainer,

csound builds with dh --with buildinfo.
This is now removed and will fail to build, cf. #1068809.

Patch attached.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.8
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-27-amd64 (SMP w/24 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_FIRMWARE_WORKAROUND, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
From b6cd4a2d5a3d816f97d7ab4a2d67798a4dd74a7f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=B1?= <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 03:11:07 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Remove dh-buildinfo (see #1068809)
X-Mutt-PGP: OS

---
 debian/control | 1 -
 debian/rules   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index b5bc25fb..efc0d545 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ Build-Depends:
  debhelper-compat (= 13),
  default-jdk:native [!hppa !hurd-i386] <!nojava>,
  devscripts,
- dh-buildinfo,
  dssi-dev,
  flex,
  ladspa-sdk,
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index dd6e2582..4bc16ee4 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ endif
 BUILDDIR=obj-$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
 
 %:
-	dh $@ --with buildinfo  --buildsystem=cmake+ninja --builddirectory=$(BUILDDIR)
+	dh $@ --buildsystem=cmake+ninja --builddirectory=$(BUILDDIR)
 
 PACKAGE_DATE = $(shell env --ignore-environment TZ=UTC LANG=C date -d@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) +%F)
 
-- 
2.39.5

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: