Your message dated Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:19:52 +0000 with message-id <E1sJV0K-003jLp-Po@fasolo.debian.org> and subject line Bug#1073336: fixed in pd-fftease 3.0.1-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #1073336, regarding pd-fftease: FTBFS: m_pd.h:85:26: error: static assertion failed: "field must be t_float!" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1073336: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073336 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: pd-fftease: FTBFS: m_pd.h:85:26: error: static assertion failed: "field must be t_float!"
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 14:54:46 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] Zm7gllgFyxFluJVk@grub.nussbaum.fr>
Source: pd-fftease Version: 3.0.1-6 Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Tags: trixie sid ftbfs User: lucas@debian.org Usertags: ftbfs-20240615 ftbfs-trixie Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): > cc -DPD -I "/usr/include/pd" -DPD_FLOATSIZE=64 -DUNIX -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fPIC -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2 -Werror=implicit-function-declaration -ffile-prefix-map=/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>=. -fstack-protector-strong -fstack-clash-protection -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fcf-protection -o scrape~.linux-amd64-64.so.o -c scrape~.c > ++++ info: making burrow~.linux-amd64-64.so.o in lib fftease > In file included from fftease.h:8, > from dentist~.c:3: > dentist~.c: In function ‘dentist_tilde_setup’: > /usr/include/pd/m_pd.h:85:26: error: static assertion failed: "field must be t_float!" > 85 | #define PD_STATIC_ASSERT _Static_assert > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /usr/include/pd/m_pd.h:575:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘PD_STATIC_ASSERT’ > 575 | PD_STATIC_ASSERT(sizeof(((type *)NULL)->field) == sizeof(t_float), "field must be t_float!"); \ > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > dentist~.c:63:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘CLASS_MAINSIGNALIN’ > 63 | CLASS_MAINSIGNALIN(c, t_dentist, x_f); > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > make[1]: *** [/usr/share/pd-lib-builder//Makefile.pdlibbuilder:987: dentist~.linux-amd64-64.so.o] Error 1 The full build log is available from: http://qa-logs.debian.net/2024/06/15/pd-fftease_3.0.1-6_unstable.log All bugs filed during this archive rebuild are listed at: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240615;users=lucas@debian.org or: https://udd.debian.org/bugs/?release=na&merged=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmodval=7&fusertag=only&fusertagtag=ftbfs-20240615&fusertaguser=lucas@debian.org&allbugs=1&cseverity=1&ctags=1&caffected=1#results A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute! If you reassign this bug to another package, please mark it as 'affects'-ing this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1073336-close@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1073336: fixed in pd-fftease 3.0.1-7
- From: Debian FTP Masters <ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 09:19:52 +0000
- Message-id: <E1sJV0K-003jLp-Po@fasolo.debian.org>
- Reply-to: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org>
Source: pd-fftease Source-Version: 3.0.1-7 Done: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of pd-fftease, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 1073336@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> (supplier of updated pd-fftease package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 11:03:55 +0200 Source: pd-fftease Architecture: source Version: 3.0.1-7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org> Changed-By: IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU) <umlaeute@debian.org> Closes: 1073336 Changes: pd-fftease (3.0.1-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * Patch to fix compilation with Pd64 (Closes: #1073336) * Add puredata:Recommends and puredata:Provides * Switch to dh-sequence-puredata * Bump standards version to 4.7.0 Checksums-Sha1: ac17050901938d01267ffd990bd143c2fd441038 2138 pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.dsc 78afb4fd901cc423e9b73146d8c675996078e1c5 15512 pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.debian.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: a4a389088136eb666ce370c5a6c819d66af714e2c5d358bd3f1c80c8f6d88120 2138 pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.dsc ce110c1bf725d3bfdcf379df5c941a5679c6ecf3631e43b5511e0065064e8d3e 15512 pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.debian.tar.xz Files: af1eee926f188c074da1d3bf4010bc8e 2138 sound optional pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.dsc f1600a970d982943055c37e2b55b356a 15512 sound optional pd-fftease_3.0.1-7.debian.tar.xz -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEdAXnRVdICXNIABVttlAZxH96NvgFAmZxTcUACgkQtlAZxH96 Nvg2/g/9FeRJatacegRPIx7p3TJloqVESCioebCGMu4rM5vXA7sIOU+tPgy4MesK q53J0m2ves4FTRaPZBbaej9C4E6ITWcSLr18xQYNRpRT5A3ePkJ5EFgt4hEg2psL AnTwmpKs2Bq4r1WpdR3HmJPgMcKFxeb7aSQQ9U/ZEneyG8wMOThRggNQM9mVPrsG Lqgcyw+1BJCuFsWoYedCR+3ODT5h36TtcxjGgHZJo+v77OJcc33LnTiRSzJpn2q+ Akg26IGFNnvxVqM04oPV1qQ7ibnb7lmq+O0UATAFoUk8DBMBsgr6tE/rcJmDKYdQ LvG1CBIhHfqK89G69aGRob2KvENPpqdW1jVjW9nB/smrmU/I7lA64id+IwcWbaiu xxMSC0B+dc+9iY9KpV9+PY8msbdUdBOvjfpQz/T+cAxul00nGDmx4gJXrhfLbZEW gAUYdQjcRoaPMEi9RK9Fq/2/cj1EEHynLzkW0hefIvbXd+Ll2cOC+npQLcX8utCV JPMdWlW8vV6xyhoyW85DhfVvjO6v/oVO7YvJgqawv75smoy7PrBQoVpLzdwdM/a2 nZK5Agkgkb1DL6aIFpF8xA6JjjASXiftnokQbchWLXViX6VpGkRwg8DOEJBOKKYB Xxk6VT0PvbIV0HlJ1Ixb0Mk/ZRE3neRQN605bl8J5Z9XgFG2Jf4= =0Ag8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----Attachment: pgpU7R6zTCTBu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---