[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#884782: marked as done (juce: please provide a small cmdline-utility as a Projucer replacement)

Your message dated Wed, 28 Sep 2022 11:04:02 +0200
with message-id <a9afe763-4973-143e-8fb8-05fc866bd7ee@debian.org>
and subject line Re: juce: please provide a small cmdline-utility as a Projucer replacement
has caused the Debian Bug report #884782,
regarding juce: please provide a small cmdline-utility as a Projucer replacement
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
884782: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884782
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: juce
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,

if an upstream that uses JUCE only ships the .jucer file and their own sources
(something we should encourage), then we need to pull in Projucer (juce-tools)
to generate Makefiles from that.
However, Projucer is rather heavy in terms of dependencies.
It would be super-nice if there was a lightweight alternative that could be used
as a drop-in replacement for Projucer's cmdline interface.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 19 Dec 2017 18:11:37 +0100 IOhannes m zmoelnig <umlaeute@debian.org> wrote: 
However, Projucer is rather heavy in terms of dependencies.
It would be super-nice if there was a lightweight alternative that could be used
as a drop-in replacement for Projucer's cmdline interface.




It turns out that these days Projucer is no longer that heavy in terms
of dependencies (in relation to juce-modules-source, which is needed
anyhow).

Alos, JUCE now provides a Cmake buildsystems, which many upstreams
started to use...

Thus, I'm not going to follow this any more and close this feature request.

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xB65019C47F7A36F8.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: