Bug#1002141: marked as done (osmid: FTBFS: libfmt-dev : Breaks: libspdlog-dev (< 1:1.9.2+ds-0.1) but 1:1.8.5+ds-3 is to be installed)
Your message dated Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:41:15 +0100
with message-id <YcIfy4BC/wF9citA@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1002141: osmid: FTBFS: libfmt-dev : Breaks: libspdlog-dev (< 1:1.9.2+ds-0.1) but 1:1.8.5+ds-3 is to be installed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1002141,
regarding osmid: FTBFS: libfmt-dev : Breaks: libspdlog-dev (< 1:1.9.2+ds-0.1) but 1:1.8.5+ds-3 is to be installed
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1002141: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002141
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: osmid
Version: 0.8.0~repack-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lucas@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Install package build dependencies |
> +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>
> Setup apt archive
> -----------------
>
> Merged Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (= 13), libasound2-dev, liboscpack-dev, libspdlog-dev (>= 1:1.5.0+ds), build-essential, fakeroot
> Filtered Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (= 13), libasound2-dev, liboscpack-dev, libspdlog-dev (>= 1:1.5.0+ds), build-essential, fakeroot
> dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in '/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> Ign:1 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> Get:2 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B]
> Ign:3 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> Get:4 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Sources [409 B]
> Get:5 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Packages [493 B]
> Fetched 1859 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> Reading package lists...
> Reading package lists...
>
> Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Installing build dependencies
> Reading package lists...
> Building dependency tree...
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> libfmt-dev : Breaks: libspdlog-dev (< 1:1.9.2+ds-0.1) but 1:1.8.5+ds-3 is to be installed
> E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> apt-get failed.
The full build log is available from:
http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/12/20/osmid_0.8.0~repack-2_unstable.log
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-12-21 17:08:43, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Source: osmid
> Version: 0.8.0~repack-2
> Severity: serious
> Justification: FTBFS
> Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
> User: lucas@debian.org
> Usertags: ftbfs-20211220 ftbfs-bookworm
>
> Hi,
>
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Fixed in spdlog
Cheers
>
>
> Relevant part (hopefully):
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > | Install package build dependencies |
> > +------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> >
> >
> > Setup apt archive
> > -----------------
> >
> > Merged Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (= 13), libasound2-dev, liboscpack-dev, libspdlog-dev (>= 1:1.5.0+ds), build-essential, fakeroot
> > Filtered Build-Depends: cmake, debhelper-compat (= 13), libasound2-dev, liboscpack-dev, libspdlog-dev (>= 1:1.5.0+ds), build-essential, fakeroot
> > dpkg-deb: building package 'sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy' in '/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive/sbuild-build-depends-main-dummy.deb'.
> > Ign:1 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ InRelease
> > Get:2 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release [957 B]
> > Ign:3 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Release.gpg
> > Get:4 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Sources [409 B]
> > Get:5 copy:/<<RESOLVERDIR>>/apt_archive ./ Packages [493 B]
> > Fetched 1859 B in 0s (0 B/s)
> > Reading package lists...
> > Reading package lists...
> >
> > Install main build dependencies (apt-based resolver)
> > ----------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Installing build dependencies
> > Reading package lists...
> > Building dependency tree...
> > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> > or been moved out of Incoming.
> > The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > libfmt-dev : Breaks: libspdlog-dev (< 1:1.9.2+ds-0.1) but 1:1.8.5+ds-3 is to be installed
> > E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
> > apt-get failed.
>
>
> The full build log is available from:
> http://qa-logs.debian.net/2021/12/20/osmid_0.8.0~repack-2_unstable.log
>
> A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
> http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
>
> If you reassign this bug to another package, please marking it as 'affects'-ing
> this package. See https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control#affects
>
> If you fail to reproduce this, please provide a build log and diff it with mine
> so that we can identify if something relevant changed in the meantime.
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: