Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1

To: Kay Hayen <kay.hayen@gmail.com>
Cc: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, Federico Ceratto <federico@debian.org>, "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <paulliu@debian.org>, Elías Alejandro Año Mendoza <ealmdz@gmail.com>, Debian Multimedia Maintainers <debian-multimedia@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
From: László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:17:00 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] CAKjSHr1ZdzE=Gtg0kxhOqtv5Diga3VzTxjdPk9E8yUC4pB4ZGg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAMEZBDJ6ZQO99Zh+a+fAVCrH=C-vB93O4Tk5O6ti59sNFCARtw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CAKjSHr1VFtcxz+3wsPzKBgmA-3A6+Z9v+w9U54Km96eOtM1Bpw@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAHj_TLDuxbHfYQD4nmCHp1QM1OcaS7+2eicCZsYhe7tZCW9gkA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] CAMEZBDJ6ZQO99Zh+a+fAVCrH=C-vB93O4Tk5O6ti59sNFCARtw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 8:16 AM Kay Hayen <kay.hayen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have just tested Nuitka with Scons 4.0.1 on my system, and had no issues at all. It seems to me that they didn't change anything in an incompatible fashion, the majority of changes are irrelevant to Debian (Windows stuff), and dropping Python 2.7 support, which is now irrelevant to Debian testing/unstable too.
 That's correct, but my fear mostly came from the fact I've reworked
scons packaging. Now I also use the Git tree for packaging and not a
preprocessed (derived) scons source.
It still builds packages fine, just uploaded to unstable.

Thanks to all of you for testing and feedback,
Laszlo/GCS

Reply to:

References:
- RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
  - From: László Böszörményi (GCS) <gcs@debian.org>
- Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
  - From: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org>
- Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
  - From: Kay Hayen <kay.hayen@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
Next by Date: Processing of picard_2.5-1_source.changes
Previous by thread: Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
Next by thread: Re: RFC: scons/4.0.1-1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread