(Dropping the ITP bug since this dicussion is unreleated.) On 2020-07-02 08:49:08 +0000, Vasyl Gello wrote: > Hi Sebastian! > > At the moment, kodi 18.7.1 is not blocked. Also, if there is no package the dav1d support is disabled in 19 either. > However, I referred to the whole situation: the maintainers come to bring new packages and improve the existing ones, > not waiting months & years without a feedback. I don't think that the rather unique situtation of dav1d with the patent issues applies to other packages in NEW. While processing is slow at times, stuff will be processed eventually. > FYI, kodi 19 benefits much from enabling dav1d on streams like Netflix, so I build Kodi for my testing repo with dav1d packaged. > Same applies to shairplay & libudfread (I ITP'ed and packaged these under Mattia's mentorship and even persuaded the upstream > lead developer Jean-Baptiste Kempf to make a new tag for libudfread after three years since the packaged tag was released) > > Jean-Baptiste expressed big wish to have dav1d and libudfread in Debian during our conversation related to udfread tagging, > so I feel obliged to do everything I can to make it happen. Do you have a pointer to this conversation on libudfread as separate package in Debian? The first time I looked at libudfread, upstream (which includes JB) was against packaging libudfread as it was considered an implementation detail of libbluray. Cheers > -- > Vasyl Gello > ================================================== > Certified SolidWorks Expert > > Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > > E-Mail: vasek.gello@gmail.com > > Skype: vasek.gello > ================================================== > 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > > July 2, 2020 8:41:38 AM UTC, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> написав(-ла): > >Hi Vasyl > > > >On 2020-07-02 08:20:11 +0000, Vasyl Gello wrote: > >> Hi Jonas! > >> > >> I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work. > > > >How is dav1d blocking kodi work? Once dav1d is in the archive in ffmpeg > >is uploaded with dav1d support enabled, won't kodi also automatically > >have dav1d support? If they kodi is using it directly, is there no > >option to disable it until it is available? > > > >Cheers > > > >> Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for review? > >> > >> Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay). > >> At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source packages). > >> > >> I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the publuc unofficial repo > >> (see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS after Kodi reaches > >> release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as development of Kodi upstream > >> progresses. > >> > >> With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it gracefully, the whole project > >> might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it. > >> -- > >> Vasyl Gello > >> ================================================== > >> Certified SolidWorks Expert > >> > >> Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77 > >> > >> E-Mail: vasek.gello@gmail.com > >> > >> Skype: vasek.gello > >> ================================================== > >> 호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다 > >> > >> July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> написав(-ла): > >> >Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51) > >> >> On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 +0000 Vasyl Gello <vasek.gello@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> > There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so. > >> >> > Can you please package it? > >> >> > >> >> dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1 > >> >> year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last > >> >> attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably > >> >> convert this ITP to RFP... > >> > > >> >I guess the rejection is what you quoted in > >> >https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25 > >> > > >> >Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters > >> >more transparent. Much appreciated! > >> > > >> >Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not? > >> > > >> >If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I > >> >would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting > >> >situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in > >> >debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package. > >> > > >> >When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into > >> >irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package. > >> > > >> >If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in > >> >maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you > >> >would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team. > >> > > >> >If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over. > >> > > >> >Kind regards, > >> > > >> > - Jonas > >> > > >> >-- > >> > * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt > >> > * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ > >> > > >> > [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private > > > > > > > >-- > >Sebastian Ramacher -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature