[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#916333: ITP: dav1d -- fast and small AV1 video stream decoder



Dear colleagues,

I am importing dav1d 0.7.1 in an hour. Please consider this FYI to avoid double work.
-- 
Vasyl Gello
Certified SolidWorks Expert

Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77

E-Mail: vasek.gello@gmail.com

Skype: vasek.gello
호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다

July 2, 2020 8:20:11 AM UTC, Vasyl Gello <vasek.gello@gmail.com> написав(-ла):
Hi Jonas!

I also can volunteer uploading 0.7.1 as part of my kodi work.
Also, is it a good idea to reach Joerg Jaspert directly and kindly ask for review?

Why am I asking this: I have two pending packages (libudfread & shairplay).
At the same time, I am preparing full Kodi binary addon archive (84 source packages).

I am carefully investigating copyrights and perform builds and tests in the publuc unofficial repo
(see relevant d-multimedia discussiob). However, I don't want to wait YEARS after Kodi reaches
release. Instead, I am using my sparevtime to keep packaging ready as development of Kodi upstream
progresses.

With such enormous waiting times and no understandingbof how to solve it gracefully, the whole project
might become a waste of time and I obviously try avoiding it.
-- 
Vasyl Gello
Certified SolidWorks Expert

Mob.:+380 (98) 465 66 77

E-Mail: vasek.gello@gmail.com

Skype: vasek.gello
호랑이는 죽어서 가죽을 남기고 사람은 죽어서 이름을 남긴다

July 2, 2020 8:11:03 AM UTC, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> написав(-ла):
Quoting Dylan Aïssi (2020-07-02 09:29:51)
On Tue, 30 Jun 2020 03:38:20 +0000 Vasyl Gello <vasek.gello@gmail.com> wrote:
There is a new upstream release 0.7.1 for a week or so.
Can you please package it?

dav1d is in the NEW queue since 1,5 years. It was rejected after 1
year in the NEW queue and I still don't have news about the last
attempt. I am losing motivation for this package, I will probably
convert this ITP to RFP...

I guess the rejection is what you quoted in
https://bugs.debian.org/916333#25

Thanks, btw, for quoting like that to make conversations with ftpmasters
more transparent. Much appreciated!

Did you try re-upload since the rejection? If not, why not?

If that was the only reason given by ftpmasters for rejecting, then I
would suggest to simply a) make sure that the licensing/patenting
situation as you understand it is explicitly laid out in
debian/copyright file, and then b) re-release the package.

When re-uploaded, I can suggest to try nudge ftpmasters by logging into
irc channel #debian-ftp and kindly request a review of the package.

If you haven't given up yet, then would you be interesting in
maintaining the package collaboratively? I can offer to help if you
would be interested in doing so e.g. in the Multimedia team.

If you have given up already, then I can offer to take over.

Kind regards,

- Jonas

Reply to: