Hi On 2020-02-21 09:41:56, GMiller wrote: > A few questions. Bug915386 is just a heads up. It is not really an RFP. > Should I post an RFP or ITP to get things started? Do you suggest anyone to > contact to assemble a 'team'? fdk-acc is already available in Debian, so a RFP or ITP is not needed. ITPs and RFPs are used when completely new packages are introduced in Debian. > Thank you for the offer. If we succeed we will contact you for sponsorship. > > For others that might become involved, bear in mind that I am not a regular > Debian maintainer and my experience is limited. It seems to me that > experienced members of the Debian Multimedia Group should be involved in > this project. If proper I could join the multimedia group but I only need > this one package. Does anyone else want to contribute to packaging > libfdk-aac-dev 2.0.1? fdk-acc is maintained by the Debian Multimedia Team. To join it, please see https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia Best -- Sebastian Ramacher
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature