Bug#940855: marked as done (gpac: CVE-2018-21017)
Your message dated Sat, 21 Nov 2020 17:13:26 -0500
with message-id <CAJ0ccebW9i+YbnspBC3q_3TfG6hEcrdsTSsvVTEX8DqjensFRQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line forgot to close
has caused the Debian Bug report #940855,
regarding gpac: CVE-2018-21017
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
940855: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=940855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: gpac: CVE-2018-21017
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 23:30:20 +0200
- Message-id: <156901502029.25139.7995043731408002886.reportbug@eldamar.local>
Source: gpac
Version: 0.7.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: normal
Tags: security upstream
Forwarded: https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/1183
Hi,
The following vulnerability was published for gpac. The issue does not
affeect unstable (please double check though). Filling the bug mainly
for tracking, the version in experimental is affected and issue would
be fixed with v0.8.0 upstream.
CVE-2018-21017[0]:
| GPAC 0.7.1 has a memory leak in dinf_Read in isomedia/box_code_base.c.
If you fix the vulnerability please also make sure to include the
CVE (Common Vulnerabilities & Exposures) id in your changelog entry.
For further information see:
[0] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2018-21017
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2018-21017
[1] https://github.com/gpac/gpac/issues/1183
Regards,
Salvatore
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 1.0.1+dfsg1-1
--
regards,
Reinhard
--- End Message ---
Reply to: