Your message dated Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:52:57 -0500 with message-id <e97a1c6a9b0e88c4a92046907f4cd217a6b93ab5.camel@debian.org> and subject line Re: libgav1 FTBFS on armel: symbol differences has caused the Debian Bug report #973989, regarding libgav1 FTBFS on armel: symbol differences to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 973989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973989 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: libgav1 FTBFS on armel: symbol differences
- From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:41:56 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 160485371616.12675.9014710571885173387.reportbug@localhost>
Source: libgav1 Version: 0.16.0-4 Severity: important Tags: ftbfs Control: affects -1 src:libavif https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgav1&arch=armel&ver=0.16.0-4&stamp=1604703920&raw=0 ... dh_makeshlibs -a -a dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libgav1-0/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libgav1-0.symbols --- debian/libgav1-0.symbols (libgav1-0_0.16.0-4_armel) +++ dpkg-gensymbolsvcOZhb 2020-11-06 23:05:17.669923566 +0000 @@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ _ZN7libgav17DecoderC2Ev@Base 0.16.0 _ZN7libgav17DecoderD1Ev@Base 0.16.0 _ZN7libgav17DecoderD2Ev@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTIN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=!riscv64)_ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=!riscv64)_ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTSN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=!riscv64)_ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=riscv64)_ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 - (arch=!riscv64)_ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTIN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64)_ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64)_ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTSN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64)_ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 + _ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64)_ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 (c++|arch-bits=32)"libgav1::Decoder::EnqueueFrame(unsigned char const*, unsigned int, long long, void*)@Base" 0.16.0 (c++|arch-bits=64)"libgav1::Decoder::EnqueueFrame(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, long, void*)@Base" 0.16.0 dh_makeshlibs: error: failing due to earlier errors make: *** [debian/rules:34: binary-arch] Error 25
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 973989-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: libgav1 FTBFS on armel: symbol differences
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 09:52:57 -0500
- Message-id: <e97a1c6a9b0e88c4a92046907f4cd217a6b93ab5.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 160485371616.12675.9014710571885173387.reportbug@localhost>
- References: <[🔎] 160485371616.12675.9014710571885173387.reportbug@localhost>
Version: 0.16.0-5 This is fixed in a recent upload. Thanks, Boyuan Yang On Sun, 08 Nov 2020 18:41:56 +0200 Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> wrote: > Source: libgav1 > Version: 0.16.0-4 > Severity: important > Tags: ftbfs > Control: affects -1 src:libavif > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libgav1&arch=armel&ver=0.16.0-4&stamp=1604703920&raw=0 > > ... > dh_makeshlibs -a -a > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: some new symbols appeared in the symbols file: see diff output below > dpkg-gensymbols: error: some symbols or patterns disappeared in the symbols file: see diff output below > dpkg-gensymbols: warning: debian/libgav1-0/DEBIAN/symbols doesn't match completely debian/libgav1-0.symbols > --- debian/libgav1-0.symbols (libgav1-0_0.16.0-4_armel) > +++ dpkg-gensymbolsvcOZhb 2020-11-06 23:05:17.669923566 +0000 > @@ -21,15 +21,15 @@ > _ZN7libgav17DecoderC2Ev@Base 0.16.0 > _ZN7libgav17DecoderD1Ev@Base 0.16.0 > _ZN7libgav17DecoderD2Ev@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64)_ZTIN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64) _ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=!riscv64) _ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64) _ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=!riscv64) _ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64)_ZTSN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64) _ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=!riscv64) _ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=riscv64) _ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > - (arch=!riscv64) _ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTIN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64) _ZTISt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64) _ZTISt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTSN9__gnu_cxx7__mutexE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64) _ZTSSt11_Mutex_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > + _ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE1EE@Base 0.16.0 > +#MISSING: 0.16.0-4# (arch=!riscv64) _ZTSSt16_Sp_counted_baseILN9__gnu_cxx12_Lock_policyE2EE@Base 0.16.0 > (c++|arch-bits=32)"libgav1::Decoder::EnqueueFrame(unsigned char const*, unsigned int, long long, void*)@Base" 0.16.0 > (c++|arch-bits=64)"libgav1::Decoder::EnqueueFrame(unsigned char const*, unsigned long, long, void*)@Base" 0.16.0 > dh_makeshlibs: error: failing due to earlier errors > make: *** [debian/rules:34: binary-arch] Error 25Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---