Your message dated Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:10:58 +0100 with message-id <e650677d-d25f-439b-f5cb-771ff3a905d1@p10link.net> and subject line re: openvdb: FTBFS with boost 1.71 has caused the Debian Bug report #960500, regarding openvdb: FTBFS with boost 1.71 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 960500: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960500 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: openvdb: FTBFS with boost 1.71
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 12:50:37 +0200
- Message-id: <20200513105037.GA1477544@ramacher.at>
Source: openvdb Version: 7.0.0-3 Severity: important User: team+boost@tracker.debian.org Usertags: boost1.71 openvdb fails to build with boost 1.71 as default: | -- Found Python: /usr/bin/python3.8) (found suitable version "3.8.3", minimum required is "3.7") | -- Found NumPy: /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/numpy/core/include (found suitable version "1.18.4", minimum required is "1.12.1") | -- Found boost_python38 | CMake Error at openvdb/python/CMakeLists.txt:209 (message): | Unable to find boost_numpy38, boost_numpy3 or boost_numpy. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 960500-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: re: openvdb: FTBFS with boost 1.71
- From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
- Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 09:10:58 +0100
- Message-id: <e650677d-d25f-439b-f5cb-771ff3a905d1@p10link.net>
It seems that the actual rebuilds of the package in debian were successful, so presumably either this was some artifact of the test-rebuild environment or some issue in another package that has been fixed since.
--- End Message ---