Quoting Mattia Rizzolo (2020-05-08 21:27:44) > On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 09:25:13PM +0200, Antonio wrote: > > After several tests I realized that the problem depends on these fonts: > > "fonts-noto, fonts-noto-cjk, fonts-noto-cjk-extra, fonts-noto-color-emoji, > > fonts-noto-core, fonts-noto-extra, known-fonts-hinted, known-fonts-mono, > > known-fonts-ui-core, known-fonts-ui-extra, known-fonts-unhinted ". > > Once removed, everything works fine. > > Ohh, this is very interesting. > Could you please share this in the upstream bug I linked before, or > would you prefer me to proxy the message? Seems it should say "noto-fonts-*" where it says "known-fonts-*" above. Noto fonts are known to provide many entries in font menus. Should be fine if avoiding only the *-extra packages (and the fonts-noto metapackage which recommends them). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature