Re: fluidsynth 2.0
Hi Felipe,
Felipe Sateler wrote:
> I think the first step would be to prepare a package targeting
> experimental, see how much stuff fails to build and how hard it is to fix.
thanks for the heads-up!
As the one who uploaded the last two 1.x packages, I agree this is the
right way to go.
However, I have no plans to undergo the API transition myself, so please
don't count on me. I currently have a 2 months old baby at home and don't
even use the library myself apart from occasionally playing
SDL2_mixer-using games. My reason for uploading the previous packages was
that it included a patch by me which added support for playing SF3 format
sound fonts.
> With that info, it can be decided if it's best to keep both or port all
> apps to version 2.0.
My impression is that upstream has abandoned the 1.x series and we should
be wise enough to do the same in Debian.
Thanks,
- Fabian
Reply to: