[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#913915: juce: VST2 support has been dropped



Hi. I'm the author of a personal fork of JUCE, currently at 5.4.1,
which permits building VST2 without use of a non-free Steinberg
developer kit.

Olivier Humbert (trebmuh) has pointed me to this bug, and I think I
should give my humble answer since I did a bit of work on this.

> Until there is a proper solution for the problem, i suggest to keep
> JUCE from migrating to testing.

The DISTRHO plugin framework aka DPF, permits to build VST2 based on
VeSTige, a reverse-engineered header, free of Steinberg's licensing
restrictions.

In a recent commit of my JUCE fork, I did the same by permitting to
integrate VeSTige into JUCE as a replacement of the usual framework.
https://github.com/jpcima/JUCE/commit/2414d676068ee96c5f53f18882889f8a1f77564c

This is not widely tested in another context than my own plugins, and
it is a lossy process in some ways, since VeSTige does not cover the
entirety of original specifications.
So I had to disable some functionality in JUCE under conditional
compilation,

Among lost functionality are: system-exclusive MIDI handling, more
advanced audio channel layout specifications, double precision
processing.

---
About the VeSTige header: I did some modifications, which are only
structural, *not by any means altering any definitions inside*, in order
to make it well integrate into JUCE well as a substitute.
(#define would need conversion to enum values, so they can be
namespaced as JUCE needs)
A change as trivial as this would be probably fine, but I was told there
is some reluctancy to update this header, no matter how little a change
may be, because of delicateness of licensing situation and the
hostility Steinberg has engaged against free projects.
See: https://github.com/DISTRHO/DPF/pull/83#issuecomment-439180772


Reply to: