El 27/11/08 18:01 Reinhard Tartler escribió: > Felipe Sateler <fsateler@gmail.com> writes: > > OK, so I'm about to co-maintain liblo, which is an OSC library, and can > > be considered a multimedia package (csound, rosegarden and ardour are > > some "big" packages using it). > > ok. cool! > > > So... I want to bring it under the scope of the teams-to-become-one. I > > have imported the sources into a git repository. > > IIRC we agreed on tracking upstream releases in an upstream branch, > maintain debian packaging in a branch derived from the upstream branch > but keep patches to the upstream source in quilt. Is that correct? > > We should really document that somewhere. Probably on wiki.debian.org > would be a good place. OK, I've started a page: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/Merge. Please add, edit, remove whatever you think necessary. I just filled a stub based on what I think we have agreed. > > > demudi already has a git area > > enabled in alioth, pkg-multimedia doesn't. Should I use the demudi area? > > What list should I put in the Maintainer field? > > Given that pkg-multimedia is more active maybe we should it? > > I really don't mind using pkg-multimedia-maintainers, since it is more > active. I've setup a doodle poll, please vote here: > > http://doodle.com/v6df6bx2akdft73f Great! I placed my vote. I agree with Fabian that debian-multimedia may be associated with Marillat's repository, and we should avoid that. Free's point about using the same project for lists and everything is also important. Using different alioth projects would be confusing, I think. > > > BTW, I have applied for joining the pkg-multimedia project, in case we > > end up using any resources there. > > I noticed you have already been added! welcome! Cool. Saludos, Felipe Sateler
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.