[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#491116: jackd: Unreasonable xrun numbers



Is your issue solved by the recommendation to use 3 periods that you got
from the jack list?

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 09:06:04PM +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Package: jackd
> Version: 0.109.2-3
> Severity: normal
> 
> After starting jackd with realtime priority, as a non-root user (using the
> /etc/security/limits.conf trick described in /usr/share/doc/jackd/README.Debian),
> I get very unreasonable xrun numbers in the Messages log of qjackctl. E.g.:
> 
> **** alsa_pcm: xrun of at least 1216234611802.112 msecs
> 
> That would correspond to a delay of about 33 hours :-)
> 
> Best regards,
> Torquil Sørensen
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: lenny/sid
>   APT prefers experimental
>   APT policy: (750, 'experimental'), (700, 'unstable')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> 
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.25-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
> Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
> Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
> 
> Versions of packages jackd depends on:
> ii  libc6                         2.7-12     GNU C Library: Shared libraries
> ii  libjack0                      0.109.2-3  JACK Audio Connection Kit (librari
> ii  libreadline5                  5.2-3      GNU readline and history libraries
> ii  libsndfile1                   1.0.17-4   Library for reading/writing audio 
> 
> Versions of packages jackd recommends:
> ii  libpam-modules             0.99.7.1-6+b1 Pluggable Authentication Modules f
> ii  qjackctl                   0.3.2-1       User interface for controlling the
> 
> -- no debconf information
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-multimedia-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.




Reply to: